Operating company
Additional revenue, without giving up any of your business or your content.
Opus Archives pays digital companies to use some of their internal content (technical documentation, tickets, code and code reviews) to train and evaluate AI models.
You keep ownership of your content and your software. Scope, permitted uses and payment are set out in a contract.
On its own, an internal document is worth little. Linked together, your tools show how a team actually worked on real situations.
describes a problem or a request, with its context.
sets out the intended solution and its constraints.
shows the change that was actually made.
shows the corrections, trade-offs and sign-off.
These sequences are used to train and test AI models on software development tasks: understanding a request, finding the relevant context, proposing a change and checking the result. That is why the links between tickets, documents and code matter as much as the content itself.
There is no price list: each body of documentation is assessed case by case.
Documentation can be given value at several points in the life of a digital company.
Additional revenue, without giving up any of your business or your content.
Dissolution or solvent liquidation: plan it before online accounts are closed.
The documentation of a discontinued product can be valued separately.
With the liquidator and on authorization of the supervising judge.
The exact scope is agreed in writing before anything is signed. Depending on what is agreed, it can include:
Source code can therefore be part of the scope. The licence does not transfer its ownership: it only permits its use to train and evaluate AI models. It grants no right to run, distribute or commercialize your software. Your brand and domain names are not affected, and you remain free to sell the software.
The steps depend on the company's situation. Choose your case.
You tell us about your business, the tools you use and the period your archives cover.
Review of tools, volume and age of the content, under a non-disclosure agreement.
A written proposal setting out scope, exclusions and amount, or a note that a licence is not relevant.
Signature of the non-exclusive licence of use; the fixed amount is paid at signature.
Export of the content, removal of identifying elements, then deletion of the raw exports.
Before closing the Notion, Jira or GitHub accounts, check whether their content can be given value.
You tell us the company and which online tools are still active; we quickly assess the archive's potential.
If unpaid subscriptions put the accounts at risk, we can run a protective export before they are closed.
Review of tools, volume and age of the content.
Offer in the usual format for asset sales, with no conditions precedent.
10% deposit by bank cheque, bank certificate of funds, declaration of independence (art. L642-3 of the French Commercial Code).
Authorization by the supervising judge, signature of the deed, then export, preparation and deletion of raw exports.
Prepared content is passed, under licence, to teams that train and evaluate AI models. Here is what they receive, and what they do not.
Your company name and brands are removed from the content: recipients do not know which company it comes from.
Staff names, usernames and addresses are replaced with consistent pseudonyms, keeping who replied to whom without revealing who they are.
Customer names and personal data found in the text are removed.
Keys, tokens and technical credentials are detected and removed.
Content that cannot be sufficiently stripped of identifying elements is not passed on.
Original exports are deleted after delivery. Only the people who need them have access, and every access is logged.
Recipients receive a licence limited to training and evaluating models. They obtain no right to run, distribute or commercialize your software.
Real software development histories, with rights cleared by a written licence.
It can be part of the scope, if you agree. The licence does not take away your ownership and only permits its use to train and evaluate AI models, with no right to run, distribute or commercialize the software.
You must hold the rights to the licensed content. That is why code written for clients or under a third-party licence is excluded. This is checked during the inventory.
It depends on usable volume, technical depth, continuity of the history and the rights available. It is a fixed amount, written into the agreement and paid at signature.
Teams that train and evaluate AI models, under licence. They receive content from which your company name, authors' identities, personal data and technical secrets have been removed.
No. Slack, Teams and email are always excluded, as are HR and legal spaces, customer files and production databases.
No. You keep your content and can continue to use it as you wish.
Opus Archives is led by Maxime Pfrimmer, a former project leader at Boston Consulting Group and founder of a software development company. That experience gave him first-hand knowledge of what technical teams produce: specifications, tickets, documentation and code reviews.
Graduate of École polytechnique and HEC.
Opus Archives is operated by Opus MP, a French SASU registered under SIREN 991 303 975, 35 rue Vital, 75016 Paris.
Tell us about your business, the tools you use and the period your archives cover. This first information lets us tell you whether an assessment makes sense.
Information you send us by email is used only to answer your request. See our privacy policy.