Technical documentation · Licence of use · Training data

Your teams have produced years of documentation. It can still generate revenue.

Opus Archives pays digital companies to use some of their internal content (technical documentation, tickets, code and code reviews) to train and evaluate AI models.

You keep ownership of your content and your software. Scope, permitted uses and payment are set out in a contract.

  • Fixed payment, made at signature
  • Non-exclusive licence: you keep your content
  • Company name removed from the data
  • Messaging and customer data excluded
Why this content has value

What has value is the path from a problem to its resolution.

On its own, an internal document is worth little. Linked together, your tools show how a team actually worked on real situations.

  1. The ticket

    describes a problem or a request, with its context.

  2. The specification

    sets out the intended solution and its constraints.

  3. The code

    shows the change that was actually made.

  4. The review

    shows the corrections, trade-offs and sign-off.

These sequences are used to train and test AI models on software development tasks: understanding a request, finding the relevant context, proposing a change and checking the result. That is why the links between tickets, documents and code matter as much as the content itself.

Payment

How we assess your content

There is no price list: each body of documentation is assessed case by case.

What we look for
Real software projects, several years of history, and above all links between tools: tickets connected to specifications, code and reviews.
What drives value
Usable volume, the technical depth of the exchanges, continuity of the history and the rights you hold over the content.
How you are paid
A fixed amount, written into the licence agreement and paid at signature.
If the archive is not a fit
We do not make an offer on every case. The assessment may conclude that a licence is not relevant; we will tell you plainly.
Who it is for

Four situations, one approach

Documentation can be given value at several points in the life of a digital company.

Operating company

Additional revenue, without giving up any of your business or your content.

Voluntary wind-down

Dissolution or solvent liquidation: plan it before online accounts are closed.

Divestment or product shutdown

The documentation of a discontinued product can be valued separately.

Judicial liquidation

With the liquidator and on authorization of the supervising judge.

What the licence covers, and what it excludes

The exact scope is agreed in writing before anything is signed. Depending on what is agreed, it can include:

Included

Included depending on scope

  • Wikis and Notion or Confluence spaces
  • Tickets: Jira, Linear, GitHub Issues
  • Specifications, runbooks and postmortems
  • Repository source code, with its history: commits, pull requests and reviews
Excluded

Always excluded

  • Messaging: Slack, Teams, email
  • Customer files and production databases
  • HR and legal spaces
  • Personal data of customers and employees
  • Code written for clients or under a third-party licence

Source code can therefore be part of the scope. The licence does not transfer its ownership: it only permits its use to train and evaluate AI models. It grants no right to run, distribute or commercialize your software. Your brand and domain names are not affected, and you remain free to sell the software.

Process

How it works

The steps depend on the company's situation. Choose your case.

Companies

  1. 01

    First conversation

    You tell us about your business, the tools you use and the period your archives cover.

  2. 02

    Inventory under NDA

    Review of tools, volume and age of the content, under a non-disclosure agreement.

  3. 03

    Assessment and proposal

    A written proposal setting out scope, exclusions and amount, or a note that a licence is not relevant.

  4. 04

    Agreement and payment

    Signature of the non-exclusive licence of use; the fixed amount is paid at signature.

  5. 05

    Export and preparation

    Export of the content, removal of identifying elements, then deletion of the raw exports.

Insolvency practitioners

Before closing the Notion, Jira or GitHub accounts, check whether their content can be given value.

  1. 01

    Case referral

    You tell us the company and which online tools are still active; we quickly assess the archive's potential.

  2. 02

    Protective export if needed

    If unpaid subscriptions put the accounts at risk, we can run a protective export before they are closed.

  3. 03

    Inventory under NDA

    Review of tools, volume and age of the content.

  4. 04

    Firm offer

    Offer in the usual format for asset sales, with no conditions precedent.

    Offer details

    10% deposit by bank cheque, bank certificate of funds, declaration of independence (art. L642-3 of the French Commercial Code).

  5. 05

    Authorization, deed and preparation

    Authorization by the supervising judge, signature of the deed, then export, preparation and deletion of raw exports.

Confidentiality

Who will see what of your company?

Prepared content is passed, under licence, to teams that train and evaluate AI models. Here is what they receive, and what they do not.

Your company name is removed

Your company name and brands are removed from the content: recipients do not know which company it comes from.

Authors are pseudonymized

Staff names, usernames and addresses are replaced with consistent pseudonyms, keeping who replied to whom without revealing who they are.

Customers and personal data removed

Customer names and personal data found in the text are removed.

Technical secrets removed

Keys, tokens and technical credentials are detected and removed.

What cannot be cleaned is left out

Content that cannot be sufficiently stripped of identifying elements is not passed on.

Raw exports deleted, access limited

Original exports are deleted after delivery. Only the people who need them have access, and every access is logged.

Recipients receive a licence limited to training and evaluating models. They obtain no right to run, distribute or commercialize your software.

Buyers

For teams that train and evaluate AI models

Real software development histories, with rights cleared by a written licence.

  • Linked sequences: ticket, specification, code change and review, in their real order
  • Executable environments where the history allows: the agent starts from the repository state before a change, receives the original request, and its proposal is checked against the project's tests
  • Traceable provenance: each dataset is tied to its licence, with the agreed scope and exclusions
  • Content prepared under one protocol: company not identified, authors pseudonymized, secrets and personal data removed
Request a presentation
Questions

Frequently asked questions

Do you take our source code?

It can be part of the scope, if you agree. The licence does not take away your ownership and only permits its use to train and evaluate AI models, with no right to run, distribute or commercialize the software.

What rights do we need to hold?

You must hold the rights to the licensed content. That is why code written for clients or under a third-party licence is excluded. This is checked during the inventory.

How is payment calculated?

It depends on usable volume, technical depth, continuity of the history and the rights available. It is a fixed amount, written into the agreement and paid at signature.

Who receives the content?

Teams that train and evaluate AI models, under licence. They receive content from which your company name, authors' identities, personal data and technical secrets have been removed.

Do you collect employees' messaging?

No. Slack, Teams and email are always excluded, as are HR and legal spaces, customer files and production databases.

Is the licence exclusive?

No. You keep your content and can continue to use it as you wish.

About

About us

Opus Archives is led by Maxime Pfrimmer, a former project leader at Boston Consulting Group and founder of a software development company. That experience gave him first-hand knowledge of what technical teams produce: specifications, tickets, documentation and code reviews.

Graduate of École polytechnique and HEC.

Opus Archives is operated by Opus MP, a French SASU registered under SIREN 991 303 975, 35 rue Vital, 75016 Paris.

Contact

Could your documentation interest Opus Archives?

Tell us about your business, the tools you use and the period your archives cover. This first information lets us tell you whether an assessment makes sense.

maxime@opus-archives.com

Information you send us by email is used only to answer your request. See our privacy policy.